Instacart, the pioneering grocery delivery and pickup service, recently embarked on its initial public offering (IPO) journey with much fanfare. However, this IPO took investors on a rollercoaster ride, with shares soaring more than 40% on their first day of trading, only to tumble back towards the offering price on the second day. Not unlike other IPOs in recent times, the dynamics of Instacart’s IPO are riddled with apparent issues, and the underlying challenges facing the company in the fiercely competitive grocery delivery market create valuation constructs that may be difficult to maintain. Is Instacart a victim of its own success?
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Instacart experienced unprecedented growth, riding the wave of surging demand for contactless grocery shopping. The convenience and safety offered by its platform propelled Instacart to new heights, solidifying its position as a key player in the grocery delivery industry. Instacart’s valuation more than doubled following its rise during the pandemic which changed the dynamics in which we value businesses.
One remarkable aspect of Instacart’s journey is its profitability, a rarity in the world of tech startups. The company not only achieved positive operating income but also delivered a net profit. In FY 2022, Instacart reported an operating profit of $62 million and a net profit of $97 million attributed to common shareholders. The impressive performance continued into the first half of FY 2023, with Instacart generating $269 million in operating income.
Instacart’s IPO generated significant excitement, with shares surging on the first day of trading. However, there is a crucial concern: is the current valuation warranted? The stock’s rapid ascent and subsequent descent are indicative of potential valuation risks. While already profitable, Instacart’s growth prospects may have been overestimated by investors.
The Instacart IPO is not an isolated case. In recent years, the stock market has seen an influx of high-profile IPOs, often accompanied by soaring valuations. These valuations reflect heightened investor enthusiasm for companies with promising growth stories, but they also raise questions about sustainability.
Businesses that experience rapid valuation growth may face a critical juncture. They must prove not only that they can maintain profitability but also that they can justify the lofty valuations assigned to them. In some cases, the market may have pushed the limits of a company’s ability to grow sustainably, leading to volatility in stock prices. Translated for those who do not speak finance so fluently, this means we are continuing to push the valuation of businesses so far that they may not ever be capable of reaching those benchmarks and continuing the same growth patterns.
This is also underscored by the multifaceted challenges facing Instacart as it navigates the post-pandemic era. The online grocery delivery market has become intensely competitive, with established grocery chains and tech giants vying for market share. While Instacart’s profitability is commendable, sustaining growth amid heightened competition poses a formidable challenge. As competition increases, a business has to compete to maintain market share
Despite its IPO success and profitability, Instacart’s stock may not be a guaranteed win. The high valuation, coupled with evolving market dynamics as pandemic-related demand subsides, raises questions about its long-term growth potential. Instacart’s IPO journey serves as a stark reminder that a strong debut does not necessarily translate into enduring market value, particularly in industries marked by rapid change and fierce competition. As investors grapple with the tension between high valuations and sustainable growth, the path forward for companies like Instacart remains uncertain.
RibotskyInstitute.com 
Leave a comment