The Great Coverup of 2024

The latest presidential debate was a spectacle, not only for the policies discussed but for the underlying concerns it raised about President Joe Biden’s cognitive health and the integrity of his campaign. Critics argue that Biden’s campaign has misled the American public and donors about his mental abilities, raising ethical questions about transparency and trust in leadership.

Last night’s debate allowed candidates to showcase their platforms and readiness to lead. However, President Biden’s performance was marked by moments of hesitation, confusion, and what some perceived as lapses in clarity. These instances have fueled ongoing concerns about his cognitive health, which have been a topic of discussion throughout his presidency.

In a revealing interview with Anderson Cooper following the debate, Vice President Kamala Harris was asked directly if this is the same Joe Biden she works with at the White House daily. Harris sidestepped the question, refusing to directly address the concerns about Biden’s cognitive decline. This evasive response only added fuel to the fire, suggesting that there might be more to the story than the administration is willing to admit.

Critics claim that Biden’s campaign has been less than forthright about the President’s cognitive health. They argue that there has been a concerted effort to downplay or obscure the extent of his cognitive decline. This alleged deception is seen by many as not just a political maneuver but a breach of public trust. The electorate deserves full transparency about the health and capabilities of those in the highest office, and any attempt to hide or misrepresent these facts undermines the democratic process.

Every person who works closely with and who has worked with President Biden for the last few years knew he was like this. Every single person. They all knew and know he was not fit to be president. They all covered for him, and this is the man with the nuclear launch codes. The magnitude of this cover-up cannot be overstated. It’s a matter of national security and public trust that those in power are fully capable of performing their duties. This concealment puts the nation at risk and betrays the trust of the American people.

The implications of these alleged deceptions extend beyond public perception. The Democratic Party has taken hundreds of millions of dollars in donations from supporters who believed in Biden’s ability to effectively lead the country. If it is indeed the case that donors were misled about Biden’s health, this constitutes a significant breach of trust and could be viewed as perpetrating fraud upon the donors. The act of knowingly misrepresenting a candidate’s health to secure financial contributions is not only unethical but could also be considered a punishable offense.

To put this into perspective, imagine if this were a securities offering. Suppose an investment was marketed based on the ability of a manager described as a stable individual. If it later turned out that this individual had experienced a significant cognitive decline, such as a stroke or the onset of dementia, this would be considered a securities crime. Those responsible for the misrepresentation would face severe legal consequences because they effectively stole from the investors who trusted them by withholding pertinent information that those investors would have liked to have known before making an investment decision. The same principle holds true in the political arena. The donors and the public place their trust in the campaign’s representation of the candidate’s health and capabilities. Misleading them in this manner is a serious violation of that trust and outright fraud.

You may hate Donald Trump, but it was clear last night that Trump has all of his faculties and can do the job. His performance, characterized by his usual assertiveness and clarity, stood in stark contrast to Biden’s. This juxtaposition only highlights the growing concerns about Biden’s ability to lead effectively.

If this were any other situation, those involved in such a significant deception would likely face serious consequences. The campaign and administration, along with Biden’s family, stand accused of perpetrating a large-scale conspiracy of fraud and deceit. As outlined in the Constitution, these actions could be considered high crimes. Those in the Democratic Party who allowed this to happen are, in the eyes of many, guilty of defrauding the American people and should be held accountable.

And let’s not forget the glaring double standard. If this were Trump in the same situation, facing allegations of hiding cognitive decline while collecting campaign donations, it’s almost certain he would have been indicted already. The swift action often taken against Trump stands in stark contrast to the leniency observed in Biden’s case, highlighting a significant inconsistency in how justice is administered.

Biden’s performance at the debate has not only raised questions about policy but has also brought to light serious concerns about the integrity of the current administration and its ability to be honest with the American public. As the nation moves forward, it is imperative that these issues are addressed with the seriousness they deserve.