In the world of modern politics, perception can often outweigh reality. The Democratic Party’s recent efforts to bolster Vice President Kamala Harris in her 2024 presidential campaign appear to be a calculated attempt to create an aura of inevitability around her candidacy. However, some pundits argue that this is more than just a savvy political strategy—it’s a nationwide disinformation campaign designed to project a winning image that may not align with the Vice President’s current standing. Gone are the days when you could actually rely on the news.
Vice President Harris, who made history as the first woman, first Black(she claims), and first South Asian Vice President, is undoubtedly a significant figure in American politics. Her historic achievements and symbolic importance have been key to the Democratic Party’s new narrative that did not give her the time of day until President Biden was pushed to exit the upcoming election. However, this narrative has been amplified by what some see as a deliberate and coordinated effort to inflate her political successes and influence.
The Democratic Party has invested heavily in media campaigns, public appearances, and social media outreach to boost Harris’s profile as she runs for president in 2024. This includes emphasizing her role in key policy decisions, highlighting her international diplomacy, and portraying her as a leader on issues like voting rights and immigration reform. All of which she falls short on since her role as Vice President was untested and if President Biden’s inner circle was fully aware of his ailments, she was at the center of this coverup. The goal seems clear: positioning her as a strong, capable leader integral to the party’s success in the upcoming election.
Pundits argue that this campaign crosses the line from promotion to disinformation. They point to instances where the narrative pushed by the Democratic Party does not match the broader public perception of Harris’s performance. Polling data, for example, has often shown mixed reviews of her job as Vice President or outright negative marks against her, with concerns about her handling of complex issues and her visibility on the national stage.
Adding to these concerns is the way media outlets have reported on Kamala Harris compared to other political figures, particularly former President Donald Trump. Every article about Harris as a presidential candidate tends to show her smiling, emphasizing her confidence and claiming she is ahead in the polls. This positive imagery is reinforced by headlines and narratives that suggest she is the inevitable choice for the Democratic Party in 2024.
In contrast, articles about former President Trump often portray him in a negative light, emphasizing any controversies or challenges he faces. The reporting tends to include a Democratic slant on his statements and actions, casting them in a critical or unfavorable context. Even more concerning is the lack of coverage on significant events, such as the attempted assassination of Trump, which has been conspicuously absent from major news outlets. This omission raises questions about the media’s role in shaping public perception and whether it is selectively reporting information that aligns with the Democratic Party’s agenda.
The Media’s Role in Perpetuating Disinformation
The collaboration between media outlets and the Democratic Party appears to go beyond simple political bias. It suggests a more coordinated effort to control the narrative and ensure that only favorable stories about Harris and the Democratic Party reach the public. Critics argue that all major media outlets seem to be in cahoots with the Democratic Party, reporting only what aligns with their interests and what Democratic supporters want to hear.
This disinformation campaign is not just a theoretical concern—it has real consequences. While the media focuses on portraying Harris in a positive light and downplaying any negative news, millions of Americans are dealing with the harsh realities of increased prices, constricted job growth, and immigration issues, that are allowing millions of immigrants who have entered the country illegally to be supported by American taxpayers. These immigrants, do not pay taxes themselves, placing an even greater strain on citizens who are already struggling to afford basic goods and services.
In politics, perception is powerful. If a candidate is perceived as a winner, that perception can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Democratic Party’s campaign appears to be banking on this, creating a momentum around Kamala Harris that may help solidify her position as the leading figure in the 2024 election. However, if this campaign is indeed rooted in disinformation, it could backfire, eroding trust in the party’s messaging and in Harris herself which is an electoral issue that will come to roost for Democrats in November.
Whether one views the Democratic Party’s efforts as a strategic elevation of a key figure or a disinformation campaign, the implications are significant. As the 2024 election cycle progresses, the narrative surrounding Kamala Harris will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping her political future. The key question remains: will the perception crafted by the Democratic Party and amplified by a seemingly compliant media align with the reality perceived by the American public? Only time will tell.
In the meantime, the public needs to remain vigilant and critical of the information being presented, ensuring that political narratives are grounded in truth rather than crafted for convenience. The stark differences in how candidates like Harris and Trump are portrayed, along with the selective reporting on issues affecting millions of Americans, should serve as a reminder of the powerful influence of media and the importance of seeking out diverse perspectives. In other words, the public should use the intelligence they were born with to decide if what they are reading is the truth or not.
RibotskyInstitute.com 
Leave a comment